« Jorn, Where Are You? | Main | Looney Looney Blog Entry »

Where There Is Bread

Dean has a short post describing his rationale for renouncing Christianity (he disagrees with fundamentalists on the heavenly status of non-believers.) The post has generated 115 (!) responses, many of them longer than the original post. So I thought a post from a believer who once thought like Dean might be of interest.

I renounced Christianity, and God, during my 20's and 30's largely because I viewed it as a tool of evil men used to control credulous, fearful and superstitious people. I believed that (if he existed) Jesus Christ had been a good man, perhaps a perfect man, but that his time on earth had been wasted if all that came of it was Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell and their ilk.

And I was utterly convinced that Robertson and Falwell were representative - moralizing, threatening, filled with condescension and vitriol for those who did not share their beliefs. Christianity was about who's in and who's out, and nothing else.

Now, don't get me wrong: I still believe that religion is frequently used as a tool by evil men to control people. But, hell, I also believe in guns, and that's also a pretty apt description of how they're frequently used. I also believe that this will have to end if the work of God is to be done on earth. And that's what has changed about me: my understanding of the work of God.

I kept going to church during my renunciation, of course. American social life is set up so that it's very difficult to avoid stepping foot inside a church at some time or other. I was married in a church, and attended that church for several months in the runup to my wedding. Also, at my wife's insistence, my son was baptized in the church that my in-laws were attending at the time, and we attended a few events there also. But at those times, I was incurious about what was going on and looking for things to carp about. I readily mocked (still do) the pastors' desperate reliance on insights gained from TV shows. And the scriptural references all seemed so much gobbledy-gook.

Then, something changed. You'll laugh, I guarantee you will. I have no defense against your laughter so I'll just come out and say it:

I started listening to Dr. Laura.

Heavy-handed moralizing? Check.
Sneering condescension toward non-believers? Check.
Reliance on easy answers based on hastily-considered scripture? Check.

But. But. But.

There was no denying that she was a smart lady. And there was no denying that she was doing good work: her foundation was helping the poor and sick, and she was obviously putting her heart (not to mention her blood, sweat and tears) into it. I admired that. And, most importantly of all, I found that I never, or hardly ever, disagreed with the advice she gave her callers.

This post is not intended to be a defense of Dr. Laura, and comments attacking her will be ignored. My intent is to describe how I started thinking differently about religious people. She was the first religious person I'd ever heard who I didn't want to immediately put into a sack and drown. And so she got me to thinking.

I thought about people like C.S. Lewis, T.S. Eliot, J.R.R. Tolkien - believers all, and people who I knew to be brilliant. How is it, I thought, that I have rejected out of hand (and out of ignorance) that which these brilliant people have believed? Am I really that much smarter than them? Or, for that matter, that much smarter than the preachers I'd heard? What made me think I knew, really knew, what was going on in their hearts and minds? The preacher who preached about last week's episode of "Touched By An Angel" had, I knew, at least twice as much education as I did; maybe he'd learned something. Maybe I'd learn something by listening to him or someone like him.

I told my wife I wanted to start going to church. She was happy to oblige and we started exploring. I set some ground rules: I would walk out if I heard people I loved attacked. I would walk out if I was threatened with Hell. In short, I would walk out if I found the church living down to my previous, easy stereotype of it.

None of these things ever happened. I think I might have been lucky. We stuck largely to Episcopal churches for Tasha's sake, and Methodist churches for my sake (I'd attended a Methodist church during a teen "believing" phase, where "belief" is defined as "belief that it was a good way to get next to some girls who went to the church.") I heard nothing overtly offensive, although I noticed some things that bugged me. For instance, I felt compelled to tell someone once that I could tell the difference between the thrumming of a low pedal key on the organ, and the Spirit moving me. (I'm still cynical about showmanship's place in the church, no doubt about it, although I sing in the choir.)

Things stayed this way for about a year, until we moved to our home in Gwinnett County. We'd been living in a Buckhead apartment and had never settled on a church. We'd felt like outsiders everywhere we went, probably because we felt like outsiders in our own lives - we hated our apartment and so we hated (largely) our lives.

Then when we moved, we started attending one church regularly. St. Matthew's Episcopal Church in Snellville is a smallish but rapidly growing parish with a wonderful man named Doug Coil as rector. The people were accepting and seemed genuinely glad to have us there.

All that was fine as far as it went, but after a few weeks there we stopped going - Tasha was pregnant and our daughter was born in December. To our surprise and delight, Fr. Doug appeared in Tasha's hospital room and blessed Annie, and then fell asleep in one of the chairs in the room.

So we started attending again after Annie came home. And something else started happening. I started feeling a new relationship with the world and the people around me. I looked inward and found something there that I'd never seen before. Just as visiting a gym every day and climbing onto the treadmill will eventually strengthen your heart, I found a part of me being strengthened that I'd never paid serious attention to before. It's hard to describe - it was an acceptance of people's flaws, a desire to see the best in the world, a hope for the best for the people around me, a hunger for knowledge beyond the remotely intellectual. I call that my spirit.

I listened to the liturgy and the homilies and was reminded of what I'd read of Eastern spirituality, of the duality of existence and the importance of seeing the now for what it is, and more importantly the past and future for what they are not. Scripture that I'd previously read as rotely proscriptive of feeling or doing fun stuff, I now came to read as pointing to a new understanding of the fun stuff, of its insufficiency to fill the Now, of the distance it places between us and the Now.

This is all starting to sound gobbledy-gooky again. The important thing to me, and the reason I willingly recite the Nicene Creed every Sunday, is because of my gratitude to God's church, for what it has done for my spirit, and for what I believe it can - must - do in the world - one believer at a time. Contrary to every media representation of the church, and there are plenty, I have never been threatened with Hell at any church; I have never been singled out for any behavior and told that it was sinful. Some of the people are tiresome, but largely they're happy tiresome people, and that makes a huge difference.

Bottom line: believing in God has changed my life for the better, and nothing but the better. I am an example of Hell being defined as separation from God, because I separated myself from God and I know that's where I was.

I don't want any of my atheist or agnostic friends and family to think that this means I think they should change or that I'm better than you are. I believe, as Fr. Doug once told me, that "Evangelism is showing a hungry man where there is bread." I long ago gave up my mind-reading attempts, and so I will not presume that you are among the hungry just because you're not eating at the banquet I have found.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

Your testimony (ooh, I hate some of those "Christian" words, but what else do I call it?) is wonderful. It is exactly how I've felt. Some years ago I went through a major time of wandering away from God, and it was hell for me and my family. When I figured out (the hard way) that I was in a spiritual desert, and came back to my senses, I was so glad that I could count on God for comfort, strength and forgiveness. I can't imagine life without Him.

Comments

I'm an ex-Christian, and I thought your "testimony" was great, too. I can see how my life has been somewhat different than yours, and therefore why I am "not hungry" (in the way you described). I'm glad that you seem to not judge people, and don't appear to think that they are wrong because they don't believe like you do. One quick response to one thing you said: There are also a lot of very smart people who are atheists & agnostics. A lot more who are deists (but not theists). Others who come from numerous other belief systems. So, which ones are/were right? I think probably none of them. Do what works for you... and don't use your faith as an excuse to hurt other people. Amen? Amen. :-)

PS: replace the "???" with "314" to get my valid email address.

Comments

Good point, Zak, and I want to make it clear that it wasn't atheists coming out on the short end of any debate with believers that piqued my interest. Rather, it was the challenge those people posed to my own stereotype of Christians as unthinking sheep.

One thing I have been extremely grateful for at my own church is that, although we are joined together in fellowship, the spiritual journey is acknowledged as a personal one that each person can only take for himself. "Do what works for you" is as good an evocation as any of that. But, I will be so bold as to add...please...DO SOMETHING! Your spirit will thank you and the universe will thank you.

("spirit" meaning, of course, whatever you want it to mean ;)

Comments

For years I had the same argument with the men in charge of Christianity. I decided to read the Bible (having already read Lewis, Elliot and Tolkien extensively). I, like so many others, discovered a vast difference, amounting to a chasm, between much of what is said in the New Testament and Christianity as it has manifested through history in its institutional form. Many Christians may belong to or even lead Christian institutions, but when they begin speaking or acting in intolerant ways I'm not sure they are "getting" the point.
Eventually I began to attend an unprogrammed Quaker meeting near my house, and that, combined with my practice of tai chi (with a Taoist master), has gone a long way towards helping me live happily with the constant presence of God--an awareness I always had but couldn't figure out how to best open myself to & incorporate into my daily life.
The Quakers and the Taoists also teach the primacy of the inward spiritual journey & consequent modification of behavior and attitudes, as opposed to external corporate religion & adherence to doctrine: that of God is in every one of us, not dispensed through human authority. Thus we must travel the path ourselves, though in the company of others.


Comments

"One thing I have been extremely grateful for at my own church is that, although we are joined together in fellowship, the spiritual journey is acknowledged as a personal one that each person can only take for himself. "Do what works for you" is as good an evocation as any of that."

-While I enjoyed reading your journey (I am just a random websurfer who happens to be passing through), I must strongly disagree with this statment (I guess that's "what works for me") Yes, our spiritual journeys are unique to each one of us. On the other hand, the idea that any religion is as good as the next and what's most important is what makes *you* happy is a reflection of the same sort of rampant individualism run amok that is destroying western civilization. What matters is whether or not something "melts your butter" but if it's true. If Christianity is true, then there is a heaven and a hell, a kingdom of light and a kingdom of darkness, and God came to earth to show us how to get to join the good guys and get to the good place, to put it incredibly bluntly. Yes, I too deplore it when fundamentalist Christians think that a person's spiritual journey can be reduced to a multiple choice exam. But, on the other hand, one must deal with facts and realities (as Dr. Laura would say). Or else you can choose to live in la-la land and do as you please and gamble that Christianity is wrong. But the Faith deserves to be considered--to not choose is to choose.
We, as Americans, must get away from all of this "going off to find ourselves", leaving our families to chase the almighty dollar or self-actualization in my career and get back to the most important things in life: God, family, friends--all the rest is secondary.

Comments

Clarification: The above comment was directed at the resonse to the essay, not the essay itself, which I appreciated.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)